Wednesday, October 22, 2008

The Board Without Direction

Known to nearly everyone in the area is the Mifflin County Regional Police board’s firing of Chief William Herkert. The board says they fired him for willful misconduct and insubordination but would not allow a public hearing that details how Herkert’s actions warranted his dismissal.

Interestingly, when a board makes a decision to fire someone, its members usually want to state their reasons publicly so the populace would understand that their decision was reasonable, not arbitrary and capricious. They often feel frustrated because confidentiality and possible litigation prevent them from doing so.

This leads to the $64,000 question. Why would the board not welcome Herkert’s request for a public hearing if they believed their reasons for firing him were valid?

One explanation could be the validity of the “internal investigation.” I suspect it is full of holes. As any police officer will tell you, conducting a valid investigation involves finding tangible evidence of wrongdoing. This requires that investigators separate fact from opinion and verify the evidence they have without bias toward the accused or accuser.

This begs a second question. How can an accurate internal investigation be conducted against the boss without bias when those conducting the investigation are affected by the boss’s dismissal?

The board could have hired an external investigator with no ties to the regional police force to conduct the investigation if they truly wanted the facts to come out. Instead, they chose to trust the word of the officers who stand to gain the most from Herkert’s dismissal, over the word of Chief Herkert.

It sounds to me like Chief Herkert wanted to make changes in the force and these changes upset the officers who were comfortable with the way things were done before he came. And because they didn’t like his new way of doing business, they successfully conducted an end-run around him and got him fired.

The board’s action to fire Herkert emphatically states that they believe the regional police officers know best how to run the force. If so, then they should not hire another police chief and simply allow the officers to conduct police business on their own the way they want with no direction from a higher authority. Or perhaps, the board could buy a cardboard cutout to serve as police chief, prop it up behind the desk, and rig a voice-activated tape recorder to it that says “yes” anytime someone makes a request.




I again ask for all members of the board of directors of the Mifflin County Regional Police to resign. Do the right thing now, because you could not do the right thing earlier.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

You seemed to be an intelligent person with lots of thoughtful commentary - up until now. The dead-wrong content of this latest blog shows you to be otherwise. You have revealed yourself to be completely outside of any realm of knowing the real truth. But, you are in the company of many, many people in this town. It is unfortunate that the truth has not come out yet. I only hope that it can - but- the Board is NOT obligated in any way to do this based on the nature of the employment agreement. That doesn't change the fact that they should in the best interest of the community.

Anonymous said...

So basically you have no idea either......

Anonymous said...

I agree with every word you have written. You are 100% correct in asking for all of the board members resignations! I think we should be able to suspend all of them, as taxpayers, until we investigate each and everyone of their own credibility to serve in the capacity of governing our police dept. When they said that there were no "criminal" charges, that to me says this was nothing that could not have been addressed within a board meeting. Once again, the citizens of Mifflin County lose out on a good thing!

Anonymous said...

Perhaps the writer is dead wrong. But the board was given the opportunity for a public hearing, which the board denied.

Anonymous said...

The Board did not need to have a public hearing. If people want to dig up more I'm sure that they will be happy to oblige with a legal hearing. They don't want it to come to that but if it has to become criminal it will. He should be happy if all he loses is his job. There is a LOT more that people don't known that WILL come out if this gets pushed harder.

Anonymous said...

I doubt it! The way that board is run they would have went public as soon as they had something good. They said in the second meeting there was nothing criminal. What do you mean,"if it has to become criminal it will" ,why would they hold back if they had something? They have already publicly crucified the man. And why would the have to "dig" things up, either they have something substantial or they don't. From what I read today...they don't!

Anonymous said...

"From what you read...." is certainly NOT enough to base your opinion on. All of you know-it-alls on the outside trying to figure it all out haven't a clue.

Anonymous said...

Excuse me , but I DO have a little more insight than you suggest!
How can the average citizen base an opinion on anything other than what they have read...that is all they have given them...lame accusations! When they said nothing "criminal" I assumed thats what they meant!
Face it...A few or many are on a power trip. Trust me when I say, things WILL be revealed, but I doubt the Chief is going to be the one in the line of fire this time! Stay tuned!